The DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This form captures vital information about the NCO's performance, duties, and potential for future assignments. Understanding its components is crucial for accurate and effective evaluations.
Understanding the DA Form 2166-9-1 can be challenging, and several misconceptions often arise regarding its purpose and use. Here are seven common misunderstandings:
By addressing these misconceptions, individuals can better understand the significance of the DA Form 2166-9-1 and its role in the evaluation process within the Army.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document in the U.S. Army used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Alongside this form, several other documents and forms are often utilized to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of related forms and documents that may accompany the DA Form 2166-9-1.
Each of these documents plays a vital role in the evaluation and development of NCOs in the Army. They ensure that performance assessments are thorough, fair, and aligned with the Army’s standards for leadership and professionalism. Understanding these forms helps NCOs navigate their careers effectively.
How to Make Fake Insurance Card - The insurance identification number must be displayed on the card.
Hazmat Shipping Papers Template - Provisions are included on how to handle rejected or unclaimed shipments of hazardous goods.
For those seeking an efficient method for property transfer, the simple California Transfer-on-Death Deed solution provides a means to designate beneficiaries without the need for probate, ensuring that your real estate is handled as per your wishes after your passing.
Time Card Template - May serve various employee classifications differently.
When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is important to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are four recommendations for what you should and should not do:
The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. It provides a structured way to assess their skills, leadership abilities, and overall potential within their role. This evaluation plays a crucial role in career progression and helps maintain standards within the Army.
The form must be completed by the rater, senior rater, and the rated NCO. The rater is typically the immediate supervisor of the NCO being evaluated, while the senior rater is usually a higher-ranking officer who reviews the evaluation. The rated NCO must also sign the form to acknowledge their understanding of the evaluation process.
Part I collects essential administrative data, including:
Accurate completion of this section is vital for the integrity of the evaluation.
Counseling dates indicate when the rated NCO received feedback on their performance. Initial counseling establishes expectations, while later counseling sessions provide ongoing feedback. These dates help ensure that the NCO is aware of their performance and areas for improvement throughout the evaluation period.
In Part IV, the rater assesses various attributes of the NCO, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each attribute is rated as "Met Standard" or "Did Not Meet Standard." Comments are required to provide context for these ratings, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation.
The senior rater provides an overall potential assessment of the rated NCO compared to peers. This includes selecting a category such as "Most Qualified" or "Not Qualified." Additionally, the senior rater lists two successive assignments and one broadening assignment to highlight the NCO's career trajectory and readiness for future roles.
Once the form is completed and signed, it is submitted through the appropriate channels for review and processing. The rated NCO will have the opportunity to review the evaluation and understand the appeals process if they disagree with the assessment. This ensures transparency and fairness in the evaluation system.